Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jack Dee's avatar

Thank you for your work Mr. Librarian

Over the last few years I have taken it upon myself to learn what I can about Stephan Bandera, and am currently working my way through "Stephan Bandera The Life and afterlife of a Ukrainian Nationalist" by Grzegorz Rossolinski and I have come to the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely he was assassinated, by the KGB or anyone else.

Consider the evidence presented to the public.

All we have is the testimony of Kostiantyn Kapustynskyia, AKA Bogdan Stashinsky a Soviet defector in the custody of Western intelligence. He claimed while on trial that he shot Bandera with some sort of special weapon, a gun that shot a poison gas that simulated the effects of a heart attack. No such weapon was ever produced and no such weapon has been produced in the 65 years since. How exactly would such a weapon even work and what would be the advantage of using one in this circumstance? If you wanted him dead then just kill him, why try to conceal it?

Yevhen Konovalets, the other OUN leader was killed by a bomb, why use a super secret undetectable "James Bond Q division" weapon (which has never been seen or used since) to kill Bandera?

The most likely explanation is that Bandera died of a regular heart attack and the rest is a classic bit of Cold War black propaganda.

There are many other particular details to work through and I would be greatly interested in your perspective on my theory

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts